Skepticism, cynicism, and student politics.

There’s a quote from the socialist author and journalist Paul Foot which comes to mind whenever I think about campaigns. Foot writes (and I paraphrase): “It is impossible for a radical to be a cynic. A skeptic, perhaps, but a cynic, no.” What Foot seems to be saying is it’s normal for radicals of all breeds to be pessimistic – who can blame them? We’re trying to change an unfair world and getting a shit ton of abuse for it – but cynicism would suggest that we know before we’ve even set up the Facebook event for that first meeting (inevitably in the Chetwynd Room in Kings), we know the projects a failure and we might as well all be playing Candy Crush, rather than trying to sort out absurd archaism that characterise Cambridge.

I bring up Foot’s quote because one of the most common arguments against student radicalism goes as follows: What’s the point? We’re all only here for 3 years plus, and we’re part of an educational institution which looks at a glacier and says to itself “ooh, steady on, mate, you’re going a bit quick,”, so what real, palpable impact can we have? There is a sad element of truth in this – student protest groups tend to come and go. I’ve been at Cambridge since 2009, and in my time here I’ve seen great, vibrant radical campaigns spring up, cause a stir and then fall apart. I’ve been involved in several – inevitably, the driving political force behind these campaigns graduates and then it all falls apart. Also, let’s be blunt, political campaigning is exhausting. I fluctuate in my political involvement, mainly because I’m a disabled man and the last time I got too political, some fascists tried to burn my house down (true facts). David Graeber makes the point that all activists go through periods of “semi-retirement.” Most do, eventually return to the political fold, but in a context like Cambridge, where campaigns are often driven by a handful of key individuals, a few people taking an understandable step back can cause the whole thing to grind to a halt. A good example of this was the End Week 5 Blues campaign, an initiative set up to combat poor mental health provisions and campaign for a reading week. I went to several meetings, and it was deeply ironic (though completely understandable) that our campaign to end mental health discrimination lost momentum because everyone got depressed, myself included.

But is cynicism then the right perspective for these groups? The cynical argument comes before the more annoying argument, which is that Cambridge is totally perfect and people who want to change it are ungrateful/trying to avoid work/Maoist infiltrators (seriously, I’ve been accused of the latter, but I heard it as Meowist, so spent the rest of the day wondering if cats were out to get us). Everyone will have their own unique experience of this place, but that doesn’t erase structural flaws, institutional problems and inequalities. You might love Cambridge from the bottom of your heart, you might have Kings Chapel tattooed over your heart, but you can’t really say that it is perfect. It’s an old institution, and like any old institution it can lag behind society and what is reasonable.

What is good about campaigns – be they CDE, Cambridge Speaks Its Mind, Whose University – is that they start a conversation, and that it itself is a radical act. And sometimes people listen. The Women’s Campaign, for instance, gets a lot of flak, most of which tends to come from, well, idiots, but it has had a palpable impact on Cambridge students life. Does your college have a decent sexual harassment policy? That was WomCam. Did you walk over Parker’s Piece and feel safer because it actually has lights? That was WomCam. Welfare based campaigns like CSIM and WU have caused student to question if their colleges are supporting vulnerable students; Cambridge Defend Education has done exceptional work exposing the real, palpable impact of cuts on University life. The list goes on. It’s a hard drag being an activist, but far too often people will claim that campaigns fail because, I don’t know, the outcome of that last meeting wasn’t full intersectional communism and free fairy cakes for all. That’s a totally pointless argument; that’s like saying you shouldn’t bother writing your essay this week because you are definitely not getting a first. Well, no, but if you write enough essays you might get a first…not going to happen if you don’t try.

So yes, I’m pessimistic, I’m skeptical if change can be achieved. But am I a cynic? No. And neither should you. If you care, go out, get involved, do your bit. And look after yourself. What you do now will benefit future generations. And that, ultimately, is what matters.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Skepticism, cynicism, and student politics.

  1. CAMBRIDGE WOMEN SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS SO CALLED RADICAL FEMINIST IS AN ABUSER. HE MANIPULATES WOMEN AND IS A THREAT TO THEM. DO NOT GIVE HIM A PLATFORM AND PROTECT YOURSELF FROM HIM.

    Like

  2. I slept with Chris Waugh once and he snores the Internationale, and insisted I roleplay Cuba so he could dress up as Fidel Castro and spank me for being too capitalist. True facts. Best shag ever.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s